· 2020-10-17T19:12:17+0000 · 731 posts

my conversation with the technical support of my hosting-service-provider about the statistics

my email to the technical support:

S.g. One.Done,

attached are the statistics from Florkz.com to my UNA blog: the visitor / computer counter is shown there:
with the number of computers steadily increasing, the visits remain at the same level.
Could it be that more computers make fewer visits because there is a broadband bottleneck?

Kind regards,
Dusko P.

Â

Dear Mr. P.,

Thank you for your email, we are happy to help you.

The statistics we provide are not very meaningful, since bots are also counted and these are not filtered.
For a precise analysis of the number of visitors, I recommend using Google Analytics.

Please do not hesitate to contact us again at any time if you have any questions or problems.

We're here to help.

Best regards

Norbert H.
Technical support

Â

S.g. One.Done,

I wrote a post on my homepage on the subject:
https://www.florkz.com/page/view-post?id=368

The point is that your statistics software has a tip for counting returning visitors:
http://www.webalizer.org/webalizer_help.html

A difference in realities is clearly visible here. Google only counts those "conversations" that are important for their "ads". This creates a quandary, a conflict of interest - you want to count less in order to have to pay less for the ads ...
Who Controls Google?

If I add the above mentioned tip to the last six months, I get ~ 30,000 returning visitors! It seems like there are multiple versions ... the controversies are counting because I don't want to start any further discussion.
As part of the censorship system?

Kind regards,
Dusko P.

Dear Mr. P.,

Thank you for your email, we are happy to help you.

The whole thing has nothing to do with censorship.
The Webalizer is based on the log files.
Everything that visits the site is tracked there.
Both real visitors and bots.
Google Analytics, Etracker and Co. record visitors in a way that is why there are deviations in the statistics.

Please do not hesitate to contact us again at any time if you have any questions or problems.

We're here to help.

Best regards

Norbert H.
Technical support

It seems like the webalizer-scientists (the design looks like the stone-age of IT, what is made by "brain scientists") didn't predict the modern development of the net (with bots...) so the webalizer users get false results and only the actual interpretation of the load is welcome.

...google still don't have the capacity to proof my attempt to join adsense...and i didn't got the fine-tuning of the database

what google else did is: to end the conid-19 restriction with an update of the analytics-platform- now without the "conversions" as one of main discipline

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Comments (1)

D
· Dusko

· 2020-10-18T18:55:05+0000
from motomo i get no more info since an update

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Not logged in users can't 'Comments Post'.

Info

Category:

Design

Created:

2020-10-17T19:12:17+0000

Updated:

2020-10-17T19:12:17+0000

the first proof of concept semi-liquid neural network (advanced LLM) run positive (SELI NEORAD for short)

https://github.com/DuskoPre/AutoCoder/wiki i'm not just testing LLMs but also creating a semi-liquid neural network (advanced LLM) with chromadb: https://github.com/DuskoPre/liquid-neural-network-with-chromadb-cache it seems there is a mayor upgrade for LLMs possible trough classifications (managing-system) of inputs to the LLM. the model is still static but trough the implementations of the classifier it can be made semi-liquid. #dichipcoin